Work, rest or entertain? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Incapacity, Protection > Work, rest or entertain?

Work, rest or entertain?

The quick pace, technological changes, and stress often cause chronic fatigue syndrome in certain employees.

«When I work, it relaxes me. Doing nothing or having visitors tires me out»
Pablo Picasso

The speed of execution, technological changes, and stress often lead to the syndrome of chronic fatigue in some employees. This diagnosis is difficult to understand for many employers and even more so for insurers.

Miss X, having suffered a "quite deep" nervous breakdown, after returning to work over five years ago, experiencing extreme fatigue again, stops working. Her doctor suggests the possibility of a diagnosis of chronic fatigue. Miss X then invokes the collective disability insurance policy provided by her employer.

In the wake of an evaluation marking the end of rehabilitation measures that lasted for a period of three years, two neuropsychologists raise the possibility of simulation. The insurer puts Miss X under surveillance and tailing for a period of five days. A video emerges from this tailing showing certain activities of Miss X. She moves around briskly, without any hesitation, from one shop to another, relentlessly shopping. Based on these findings, the insurer stops paying her any benefits.

Miss X takes her case to court and requests the payment of her benefits. Initially, the court confirms that the surveillance and tailing are admissible as evidence. Secondly, it was proven that all of Miss X's doctors have always advised her to continue her activities during her rehabilitation. The court notes that the short period of tailing corresponds to a good day for Miss X. But what about the afternoon and evening? Should she take a nap or go to bed early? There are good weeks and bad weeks.

The court deems the insurer's evidence to be incomplete and insufficient to determine Miss X's physical condition and states that it does not allow for any medical proof of the situation to be drawn. Therefore, it orders the insurer to pay her monthly benefits, retroactively. As Charles Dickens said, "Do not judge anything by its appearance, never judge anything except by evidence. There is no better rule."

*C.A. 200-09-009221-166

François Forget, notary and legal advisor, along with the entire team at ScriptaLegal, are here to assist you with the preparation of your legal documents and to answer all your legal questions.
Validity of the legal construction mortgage
Me François Forget - June 25, 2007
The Court confirms the validity of the legal construction mortgage of the subcontractor since "the very terms of...
Several buyers of new condominium units sign their purchase agreement based on plans
Me François Forget - October 17, 2018
Many buyers of new condominium units sign their purchase agreement based on plans. They learn at the notary's...
The importance of reporting a hidden defect to the seller as soon as possible
Me François Forget - April 8, 2015
In the presence of a hidden defect, it is always necessary, before undertaking the work, to report it to the...
This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file
An error has occurred.