Work, rest or entertain? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Incapacity, Protection > Work, rest or entertain?

Work, rest or entertain?

The quick pace, technological changes, and stress often cause chronic fatigue syndrome in certain employees.

«When I work, it relaxes me. Doing nothing or having visitors tires me out»
Pablo Picasso

The speed of execution, technological changes, and stress often lead to the syndrome of chronic fatigue in some employees. This diagnosis is difficult to understand for many employers and even more so for insurers.

Miss X, having suffered a "quite deep" nervous breakdown, after returning to work over five years ago, experiencing extreme fatigue again, stops working. Her doctor suggests the possibility of a diagnosis of chronic fatigue. Miss X then invokes the collective disability insurance policy provided by her employer.

In the wake of an evaluation marking the end of rehabilitation measures that lasted for a period of three years, two neuropsychologists raise the possibility of simulation. The insurer puts Miss X under surveillance and tailing for a period of five days. A video emerges from this tailing showing certain activities of Miss X. She moves around briskly, without any hesitation, from one shop to another, relentlessly shopping. Based on these findings, the insurer stops paying her any benefits.

Miss X takes her case to court and requests the payment of her benefits. Initially, the court confirms that the surveillance and tailing are admissible as evidence. Secondly, it was proven that all of Miss X's doctors have always advised her to continue her activities during her rehabilitation. The court notes that the short period of tailing corresponds to a good day for Miss X. But what about the afternoon and evening? Should she take a nap or go to bed early? There are good weeks and bad weeks.

The court deems the insurer's evidence to be incomplete and insufficient to determine Miss X's physical condition and states that it does not allow for any medical proof of the situation to be drawn. Therefore, it orders the insurer to pay her monthly benefits, retroactively. As Charles Dickens said, "Do not judge anything by its appearance, never judge anything except by evidence. There is no better rule."

*C.A. 200-09-009221-166

François Forget, notary and legal advisor as well as the entire Notaire-Direct team, are at your service to ensure the preparation of your legal documents and answer all your legal questions.
The assets owned by one of the spouses before the marriage
Me François Forget - August 23, 2005
When a spouse purchases a property using the proceeds from the sale of a property they owned before the marriage,...
How to balance retirement, divorce, and spousal support?
Me François Forget - April 30, 2009
The Quebec statistics show that more than half of marriages end in divorce. How, in the face of such statistics,...
An entrepreneur purchases a building without guarantee, at their own risks and perils
Me François Forget - April 22, 2007
Any party to a contract can add or reduce their obligations to the legal warranty, but cannot be released from...

This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file