Protecting assets before declaring bankruptcy? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Company > Protecting your assets before declaring bankruptcy?

Protecting your assets before declaring bankruptcy?

Even though the company did not decrease its assets, it "weakened" it when it sold a tangible asset in exchange for volatile values. By selling the building, the company not only acted to defraud the creditor, but also caused harm to them.

«The rich have more left when they are bankrupt than the poor in full prosperity»
Philippe Bouvard

It frequently happens that a debtor in difficulty thinks of protecting their assets before declaring bankruptcy, without any further formalities.

A company that owns three properties grants a second-ranking mortgage of $190,000 on all three properties to a creditor. After a few years, under the pretext of improving its financial situation, the company obtains a discharge of one of its properties from the mortgage creditor in exchange for a payment of $60,000. In the following months, the company sells the said property to its shareholders at a fair and commercially reasonable price. With the proceeds from the sale, the company repays the mortgages on the property as well as two ordinary debts for which the three shareholders of the company had provided personal guarantees. In the following months, the company declares bankruptcy.

The mortgage creditor who granted the discharge applies to the Court* and requests that the sale be declared unenforceable against them and that the amounts paid to the ordinary creditors be returned to them. The Court concludes that, even though the sale was made at a fair and commercially reasonable price, the shareholders "sought to their own advantage" to the detriment of the mortgage creditor.

Although the company did not decrease its assets, it "weakened them when it sold a tangible asset in exchange for volatile values (such as money)". This is the case even if the legal transaction involved valid consideration. "By selling the property, the company not only acted fraudulently towards the creditor, but also caused harm to them." For these reasons, the shareholders are ordered to reimburse the mortgage creditor for the amounts paid to the ordinary creditors.

In attempting to enrich a close associate or a creditor at the expense of other creditors, the debtor often ends up impoverishing themselves even further.

*CA 500-09-013326-038, 2004-11-08

François Forget, notary and legal advisor, along with the entire team at ScriptaLegal, are here to assist you with the preparation of your legal documents and to answer all your legal questions.
Deadline for reporting a hidden defect to the seller
Me François Forget - January 30, 2009
A seller is always liable for hidden defects, except in cases where the property is sold without any warranty and...
Covering up one mistake with another mistake is not the solution
Me François Forget - November 21, 2018
When a person realizes that they have suffered certain damages, can they invoke a breach of an obligation arising...
Brand new, all beautiful, but in a condominium, it doesn't always last
Me François Forget - January 23, 2012
If you're considering acquiring a condo, you may find it difficult to choose your neighbors, but at the very...
This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file
An error has occurred.