Is the relative value assigned to my condo fair? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Co-ownership/Condominium > Is the relative value attributed to my condo fair?

Is the relative value attributed to my condo fair?

When purchasing a condominium unit, many buyers question the fairness of the relative value assigned to their share.

«Everything is explainable, nothing is justified»
Alfred Capus

When purchasing a condominium unit, many buyers question the accuracy of the relative value assigned to their fraction. It should be noted that within five years of the registration of a declaration of co-ownership, the Civil Code of Quebec allows a co-owner to apply to a court to review the value of their private portion and the distribution of common areas.

Invoking this recourse, two co-owners request a review by the court. The court reminds that the Civil Code of Quebec states that the creator of a co-ownership must establish the relative value of a private portion based on four criteria:

  • its nature, meaning the nature and quality of the construction and materials used;
  • its purpose, not to be confused with its use, for example, does the fraction have a commercial or residential function;
  • its location in the building, such as its orientation or level of sunlight or what floor the fraction is located on;
  • its dimensions, for which consideration must be given not only to the area but also to the volume.

Until now, most declarations of co-ownership were limited to stating that the creator had taken into account the four criteria mentioned above. The court rules that this practice does not correspond to what is stipulated in the Civil Code of Quebec and establishes drafting rules regarding condominium fractions and sides with the two co-owners.

From now on, the drafter of a declaration of co-ownership must explain the weighting assigned to each of the criteria, without necessarily having to provide a detailed presentation of the calculations. If a drafter neglects to explain it, the courts will take care of it.

*CA 200-09-008750-140
François Forget, notary and legal advisor, along with the entire team at ScriptaLegal, are here to assist you with the preparation of your legal documents and to answer all your legal questions.
The usefulness of a construction insurance policy
Me François Forget - May 21, 2010
Every insurer who develops a product must have a good understanding of case law and the Civil Code; otherwise,...
Will including a residual substitution
Me François Forget - February 18, 2003
The will with substitution of de residuo allows the testator to ensure that their heir fully benefits from...
An entrepreneur purchases a building without guarantee, at their own risks and perils
Me François Forget - April 22, 2007
Any party to a contract can add or reduce their obligations to the legal warranty, but cannot be released from...
This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file
An error has occurred.