Replace a legal construction lien? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Construction > Substitution of a construction lien filed

Substitution of a construction lien filed

The construction lien has always provided priority rights to individuals involved in the construction or renovation of a property over mortgage creditors.

«For minor pains, drastic measures»
L.O. Blier

The legal construction mortgage has always provided priority rights to those involved in the construction or renovation of a building, rights that may seem excessive.

For example, a landscaper, in order to guarantee payment of invoices totaling just over $10,500, publishes a legal mortgage for the same amount on a property worth over $1,000,000. Subsequently, the landscaper gives notice of exercising the remedy for payment of the said property.

Unlike the Superior Court, the Court of Appeal * concludes that the landscaper's recourse is not abusive. The legislator leaves the creditor "completely free to choose one or the other of the available remedies (...) and, in principle, the courts should not interfere with this choice."

In addition, the Court states that instead of the initially published legal construction mortgage, the owner can offer "a guarantee of the nature of a bond, such as a bank letter of guarantee." Does the deposit, ordered by the Superior Court, of an amount of $12,000 with the registry constitute such a guarantee? The Court answers:

  • that subject to certain rules, an amount deposited with the registry of the court as a substitute for a legal mortgage "constitutes a movable hypothec with dispossession in favor of the landscaper";
  • that even in the event of the owner's bankruptcy, the landscaper will hold a first-ranking movable hypothec;
  • that the government has never exercised its right to set-off "against amounts deposited with the registry with amounts owed to the State."

The court therefore orders the owner to deposit with the registry an amount of $15,000, which is equivalent to 145% of the capital claimed, in order to guarantee the interests, additional indemnity, and legal costs. The application of the law often shows that the severity of the headaches has nothing to do with the size of the problems or amounts involved.

* C.A. Montréal 500-09-019330-091

François Forget, notary and legal advisor as well as the entire Notaire-Direct team, are at your service to ensure the preparation of your legal documents and answer all your legal questions.
The person who acts on behalf of a non-existent company incurs personal liability
Me François Forget - July 26, 2008
The Court of Appeal, after noting that the business never existed, concludes that a person who acts on behalf of a...
Some confuse asset protection trusts with fortresses
Me François Forget - September 18, 2013
Some confuse asset protection trusts with impregnable fortresses and believe they can stash all their belongings...
Savings and emergency fund
Me François Forget - July 29, 2009
The taxpayer declares that this amount represents the cash that his mother had accumulated since his birth in a...
This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file
An error has occurred.