Replace a legal construction lien? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Business Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Construction > Substitution of a construction lien filed

Substitution of a construction lien filed

The construction lien has always provided priority rights to individuals involved in the construction or renovation of a property over mortgage creditors.

«For minor pains, drastic measures»
L.O. Blier

The legal construction mortgage has always provided priority rights to those involved in the construction or renovation of a building, rights that may seem excessive.

For example, a landscaper, in order to guarantee payment of invoices totaling just over $10,500, publishes a legal mortgage for the same amount on a property worth over $1,000,000. Subsequently, the landscaper gives notice of exercising the remedy for payment of the said property.

Unlike the Superior Court, the Court of Appeal * concludes that the landscaper's recourse is not abusive. The legislator leaves the creditor "completely free to choose one or the other of the available remedies (...) and, in principle, the courts should not interfere with this choice."

In addition, the Court states that instead of the initially published legal construction mortgage, the owner can offer "a guarantee of the nature of a bond, such as a bank letter of guarantee." Does the deposit, ordered by the Superior Court, of an amount of $12,000 with the registry constitute such a guarantee? The Court answers:

  • that subject to certain rules, an amount deposited with the registry of the court as a substitute for a legal mortgage "constitutes a movable hypothec with dispossession in favor of the landscaper";
  • that even in the event of the owner's bankruptcy, the landscaper will hold a first-ranking movable hypothec;
  • that the government has never exercised its right to set-off "against amounts deposited with the registry with amounts owed to the State."

The court therefore orders the owner to deposit with the registry an amount of $15,000, which is equivalent to 145% of the capital claimed, in order to guarantee the interests, additional indemnity, and legal costs. The application of the law often shows that the severity of the headaches has nothing to do with the size of the problems or amounts involved.

* C.A. Montréal 500-09-019330-091

François Forget, notary and legal advisor, along with the entire team at ScriptaLegal, are here to assist you with the preparation of your legal documents and to answer all your legal questions.
Having a great vacation with the family, not always true!
Me François Forget - December 14, 2016
Having a great family vacation during the holiday season, in warmth and by the seaside..., not always true!
Is the relative value attributed to my condo fair?
Me François Forget - January 16, 2019
When purchasing a condominium unit, many buyers question the fairness of the relative value assigned to their...
Common-law union is not subject to any obligations, except if..
Me François Forget - January 29, 2004
Common-law union is not subject to any obligations unless the parties formalize their obligations in a...
This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file
An error has occurred.