What is a convention with a shotgun clause? | ScriptaLegal
Personal Law Business Law Packages & Subscriptions
Français About us Create a free account Log in
Interactive legal guides Legal frequently asked questions Legal blog Videos
ONLINE LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Legal blog > Company > A shareholders' agreement with a shotgun clause is "of the nature of an expropriation"

A shareholders' agreement with a shotgun clause is "of the nature of an expropriation"

Any shareholder who wants to exercise a "shotgun" clause must aim for the bullseye and hope that the master (notary or lawyer) follows the rules of the game and has read this case law.

«The weapon is the enemy of its master»
Proverbe turc

The implementation of mechanisms provided for in a shareholders' agreement often turns into a feast for lawyers as it provides enough ammunition to fuel a long legal battle between shareholders.

Thus, two brothers sign a shareholders' agreement containing a "shotgun" clause. This clause allows each of them to offer to buy the shares of the other shareholder according to the terms set out in the offer to purchase. The shareholder who receives such an offer must refuse it and acquire the shares of the offeror, on the terms of the offer or, failing that, sell his shares to the shareholder who initiated the "shotgun" clause.

One of the brothers, brother "A", initiates the "shotgun" clause and offers to buy the shares of brother "B". Before the prescribed 30-day period expires, brother "B" refuses the offer and exercises his right to acquire the shares of "A". However, in the meantime, "A" withdraws his offer and refuses to sell. "B" therefore puts "A" on notice to sign the share sale agreement, but "A" refuses because the proposed share sale agreement does not reflect the terms of the offer.

"B" turns to the Court*, two years go by, and a few days before the hearing, he submits a new proposed share sale agreement that is consistent with the initial offer. The judges conclude that the "shotgun" clause is "in the nature of an expropriation". The proposed share sale agreement was required to be "substantially" consistent with the offer. Also, the process used by "B" is not acceptable, as it "leads to the recognition of the right to negotiate the terms of the offer." The production of new proposed share sale agreements, two years after the action, is not acceptable.

Any shareholder who wants to exercise a "shotgun" clause must aim for the bullseye and hope that the master (notary or lawyer) respects the rules of the game and has read this case law.

* C.A. Québec 200-09-005621-062

François Forget, notary and legal advisor as well as the entire Notaire-Direct team, are at your service to ensure the preparation of your legal documents and answer all your legal questions.
We must take advantage of the benefits provided by the contract at the appropriate time and place, otherwise, it's already too late!
Me François Forget - April 12, 2017
We must take advantage of the benefits granted by contract when and where they are offered, otherwise, it is...
Can one attribute their losses to the "faulty conduct" of their financial advisor?
Me François Forget - June 30, 2006
A financial advisor must adhere to the portfolio allocation, otherwise they will have to reimburse the losses...
Given mandate in anticipation of incapacity is a legal tool
Me François Forget - May 28, 2007
The court rules that the mandate given in anticipation of incapacity represents the will of the mandator and not...

This browser does not support this kind of file. Please download the file to view it: Download the file